Assignment
Name:
Kunvarani Nidhi K
Paper: ‘Literary
Theory and criticism.’
Topic: ‘Examples
of ‘Deconstruction’.’
S. t. d:
M.A-(sem-2)
Roll. no: 11
Year: 2013
Allotted to:
Respected
sir,Dr.Dilip Barad
Heenaba Zala
&
‘Department Of English’
Maharaja
Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavsinhji University
Bhavnagar.
§
Examples of “Deconstruction”:
First of all for the ourselves it
is very necessary to know the term about “Deconstruction”. So, Let see What is
the meaning of “Deconstruction”.
Deconstruction, as applied in the criticism of literature,
designates a theory and practice of reading which questions and claims to
“subvert” or “undermine” the assumption that the system of language provides
grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries, the coherence or unity,
and the determinate meanings of a Literary text, Typically, a deconstructive
reading sets out to show that conflicting forces within the text itself serve
to dissipate the seeming definiteness of its structure and meanings into an
indefinite array of incompatible and undecidable possibilities.
-Jacques Derrida
(from ‘The structuralist
controversy,
Ed.Richard machsey and Donato E Baltimore)
Jacques Derrida, the French philosopher whose writings inspired the
practice of decostructive criticism from
the late sixties, and who first employed
the word ‘deconstruction’ in his influential ‘De la
Grammatologie(1967)’ helpful to note come
dictionary meanings he wanted ‘Deconstruction’ to suggest ‘Deconstruction’
taken on its meanings from its
deployment in Derrida’s work rather than from the establishment of a-
“Primitive meaning or outside of any contextual strategy”
-Derrida(1983)
Page.3
Paul de man notes approvingly of ‘Deconstruction’ that ‘no other word
states so economically the impossibility to evaluate positively or
negatively, the inescapable evaluation it implies’ Barbara
Johnson argues that-
“ ‘Deconstruction’ is not synonymous with ‘destruction’……It is
fact much closer to the original meaning of the word ‘analysis’, which
etymologically means ‘to de-construct’.The
de-construction of a text does not proceed by random doubt or arbitrary
subversion, but by the careful teasing out of warring forces of signification within the text itself.If
anything is destroyed in a deconstructive
reading, it is not the text, but the
claim to unequivocal domination of one mode of signifying over another.
-Barbara Johnson
(1980. page=5)
Here, Derrida gives the example of ‘Deconstruction’-
“All sentences of the type ‘deconstruction is x’ or ‘deconstruction is not x’, a ‘priori’,
miss the point… one of the principal things at the stake in what is called in my texts’, ‘deconstruction’ is
precisely the delimiting of ontology and above all of the third parson
present indicative: s is p”.
Derrida’s ‘ letter to a Japanese
Friend’-
“A lucid point of entry in to what is a formidably
difficult corpus: ‘Deconstruction’ is
not an analysis in particular because
the dismantling of a structure is not a
regression toward a
‘simple element’, towards an ‘in dissolution’.
Derrida‘s ‘Letter to a Japanese Friend’ (1983 a, page=4)
Another reason against the
understanding of deconstruction as a species of post-structuralism is that there are other contexts within which
Derrida works the phenomenological tradition for instance, especially the writings of Edmund Husseri. Derrida offers readings of Hegel, Heidegger, Husseri,
Rousseau as well as the structuralist avatars Saussure
and Levi-strauss.
‘Deconstruction’ is the process like this-
“If you write, Meaning is die”.
-Plato
Because meaning is in the
context not in the text. So, plato says
that if you write then meaning is die. Because
meaning of each and every word is change with the context in in which
the word is used. Every word puts comma not a full-point in the end. Because if you found one meaning
of the word. Then ,that word forced to toy to see the another meaning of
the word. one meaning of the word ‘post-pones’
or ‘promises’ toward one another in this way the
process of ‘Deconstruction’ is going on and on. Each
one word de-construct to one another word.
The process of ‘deconstruction’ is like this. If majority of the people accept anything then it’s
became reality for the everyone. Even if it’s not so. For example-
1.) white-Black
2.) Men-women
3.) Day –Night
We can see that all words like
white, Men, Day
comes in the category of the superiority
while Black, women, Night comes in the
category of the inferiority or in the category of object. But, if many people
accept Black,Women and Night as a superiority
then the idea of superiority is
changed. That is the process of
‘Deconstruction’.
We
are take one another example of
‘Deconstruction’-
1.
Time flies like an arrow.
Most of us are familiar
with this old saying, and we know it means that time passes quickly.
Time flies
like an arrow. =Time passes
(Noun)(verb)(Adv,
clause) quickly.
If I asked you to suggest
additional meanings, you might say that
the sentence could also mean that time moves in the one direction , or
straight ahead, because that’s arrows fly. But, what would happen if we thought
of the first word of the sentence as a verb in the imperative mode- telling us
to do something-and the second word a if it represented a kind of insect? Then
the sentence would be giving us an order.
Time flies like
an arrow. =Time flies as
(Noun) (Verb)
(Object) as fond of arrow.
This
exercise shows how, without changing a single word, a single sentence can have
several meanings. It’s an example of ‘Deconstructed construction’.
Conclusion:
There are
some examples of the ‘Deconstruction’ And, I think that, this answer is enough
to know about What is the meaning of ‘Deconstruction’? And, some example of
the ‘Deconstruction’.